Understanding Lean Project Management In FIFA 2018 Football World Cup
Understanding the voice of customers
“Fédération Internationale de Football Association”, merely put as FIFA, refers to world cup football. It is contested among national football team of men. To understand lean project management under the context of FIFA, the study undergoes analysis. It includes deployment of lean ideas such as lean thinking. The essay aims to deliver more value with reducing wastes for project management at FIFA.
In this study voice of customers, deploying lean management and critical to quality elements are demonstrated. The organisational management with Agile practices is also discussed here. Next, control of lean six sigma methods is also analysed here.
It is the way to understand the various methods of intentions, preferences and aversions. This has been identifying the necessities of clients. Particular challenges are faces through requirements and expectations of clients that are to be studied. Here, for those qualities are the freeways from defects, valuing delivery time, lean time, the value of costs and money are needed to be understood (Elias, 2016). This has also included different availability and warranties of parts with corporate roles. VOC is also helpful to know various environmental situations, ethical and legal compliances.
This denotes different concise, calculative and specific intentions that are considered crucial by the customers, as far as services and products are concerned. Here these elements are significant for customers or must be taken care of by customers. This is because these are based on various “must-have” attributes and satisfying customers and have been delighting them potentially. It has always been an established and measurable target. Here, customer specifications are also needed with an acceptable range of performances (Galily & Samuel-Azran, 2018). Various client expectations are having different service and product aspects like quality and speed. Here, the customers are also expected to refuse and purchase any competitor and expectations that are not met. These decisions are lying from complicated systems of different complex requirements of customers. The methods to decode essential customer elements are known, then various business processes instead of any confidence.
Moreover, the standards of different measurable performances for products and services are essential for meeting customer requirements. Here, in the case of world cup’s event are critical to meeting customer requirements. These elements are being targeted for various process development initiates for FIFA (Gillett & Tennent, 2018). This is to determine different ways in developing manufacturing and business processes. This is considered as the input to multiple tasks such as deploying quality functions, originating from customer ends. These customer elements are targeted about processes developing initiates to identify methods to build business and manufacturing processes.
Discussion on critical to customer requirements
Here, the complex internal settings are vital for meeting the necessities and wants of clients. These are known as outputs of critical-to-quality. In this way, the vent of the World Cup can use various “trees” to draw multiple lines taking place elements of CTQ and CTC. This is a type of tool to design diagrams (Sánchez, 2015). This has been interconnecting many dots present between requirements of measurable performances and particular towards customer needs. Thus to gain many perquisites of customers lesser noisy tires, the CTQ elements are considered to be the latest type of material to design. This has been a measurable property to help FIFA in achieving useful results from satisfied clients.
Thus it is seen that CTC and CTQ are parts of quality programs that is also known as Six Sigma. Here, data are used to erase various problems within any process. It takes place from manufacturing for transactional and multiple services and products. It is to indicate what is being delivered to be effective. Besides, as the quality is considered. Customers are the utmost judges. They have been revealing anything to be good (Lientz & Rea, 2016). For FIFA, the options have been from whether those factors are being supposed to be any actual quality having performance levels for exhibiting all elements. In the current session of world cup 2018, these opportunities have been based on whether those factors are being supposed to be any quality that has existed with various levels of performance of all kinds of exhibiting elements. Further, FIFA has also required remaining within CTQ and different corresponding levels of achievements. These standards are the same and exceeding common measures of the customers.
Different methods to deploy lean sigma techniques are tracking performances and make outcomes clear. Leaders should be focused on various long-term understandings. The short-term aims are important to be fulfilled. However, it is also vital to focus on the long ones. FIFA must adopt these long-term strategies to retrieve benefits. They create happy stakeholders and employees and create interested clients. Next executive commitments are to be asked. These senior leaders of FIFA support projects and initiates. Resources are not to be allocated here. Time and money must have proper returns that are also complicated. Executives negotiate those resources that are cross-functional and running roadblocks. FIFA’s project managers have been thinking of consistent implementations (Kaiser, El Arbi & Ahlemann, 2015). Apart from this, they are also able to organise across different value streams through those considerations. This efficient lean management tool has analysed current situations and designed future stated regarding different event taking products and services. These are from starting to customers having declined in lean wastes for current mappings. It focuses on different areas of FIFA. This includes products and services. These value chains are referred to all activities of FIFA. FIFA is known for material flow mapping and information. Here, reductions of wastes are also to be found out. This is an initial priority. Smaller resources should be in first place and must include strong avoiding of resources at sources. Further, these products can also be reused. Moreover, the prior waste management options must also involve recycling of materials (Holmemo, Rolfsen & Ingvaldsen, 2018).
Critical to quality parameters
For the present case, the project managers should know its values. They should be stressing over products and services. This must be done the point of customers. Customers willing to pay for products and services are directly related to how they have been giving value to that. They must know the amount of the products as the first step in pricing lean management. At the current event, the project adopted from top-to-bottom approach has priced that has defined how much the customers have wanted to pay from products for the particular value. They have comprised various wastes originating from different manufacturing processes to meter prices (Todorovi? et al., 2015). Next, the world cup event has needed to map the value streams.
These are multiple tasks included to deliver end-producer having various mapping value and agreed-on values indicating tools for visualising. Different spaghetti diagrams, Kanban and flowcharts are included in this. It is helpful for business managers and different strategy makers to find out various parts of their value streams. From here the wastes have been originating. All of these are optimised value streams for waste reductions (Sears et al., 2015). Goals are preserved here, and the flows are optimised. It has been indicating rates and evenness where data are processed through these channels. Apart from this, a pull approach can also be employed. This must be done to traditional manufacturing used for push approach in producing targets seen from various viewpoints. It is reactive to customer demands and leading to output to exceed and fail to meet essential needs. However, it has been helping customer demands to seek creations. It is done to do away with wastes that have been occurring across inventory costs and expenses (Galily & Samuel-Azran, 2018).
Further, it is complicated to deploy. It has depended on accurate and useful market analysis. This has consisted of the ability to vary in production quickly and on demand. It has been quick to assure that the customer requirements have been there as the product gets ready. However, this has also required muscular coordination if data around value streams (Heagney, 2016). In this scenario, individuals understand production requirements and different inefficiencies that have risen because of confused and mismatched expectations. Next, constant development must be done. At the heart of FIFA, lean management is an ongoing and incremental event.
It must be reminded that it is a waste-free system and practically unattainable. These goals are driving perquisites of constant development. Here, value streams are optimised continuously. It is a defective nature developed consistently and replaced with efforts to build quality. The main guideline to establish lean software is involved in amplifying learning and deciding and providing fast and empowering teams (Nicholas & Steyn, 2017).
Deployment of lean project management for FIFA
This is also used as a standard with PMP certification that is retrieved. It has occurred from a survey of different FIFA’s practices. These benefits of using PMP Certified Project managers and team members have comprised of resources that are already trained. It is expensive for companies and employees of PMBOK. This is costly for FIFA and helping to standardise different practices across various departments. It shows that people have included developing managing projects similar to that distribution (Walker, 2015). PMBOK is helpful for project managers to work with standardising systems across FIFA. PMBOK has discussed those tasks. This method has documented communities of project management. It has assisted people who are not sure of how to access risk management. PMBOK has also discussed what has not worked. This has also prevented failures of projects.
Further, FIFA has been familiar with PMBOK standards. This has customised tailoring processes of project management to fit their business necessities best. It must be reminded, to break those rules they are required to be understood first (Fleming & Koppelman, 2016). Project managers have invested time to recognise those methods. They have also spent the time to find out how and where those rules are getting broken. PMBOK has been developing around the world and is now a globally determined and strategic competency. This is a career path and subjected to educate and train. The PMBOK as comprised of different methods, areas of knowledge and processes of project management.
The process has mostly been focusing on different processes. This has been about beginning projects, initiating that and continuing with management procedure possessing particular guides. They have finalised plans for transferring that on average business. This has been as a linear method to move in a series of stages (Turner, 2014). Besides, this is a predictive and a plan-based approach. They have focused on higher goals across the projects. The roles and responsibilities of team members are also clearly analysed. Further, they are provided with the freedom to work with the goals that they have pleased.
These are defined under clear terms and adequately structured. The main focus here has been on product quality. PRINCE 2 is also changed as per suit. As this has been highly planned, this has remained under expense and time barriers. The main drawback has been related to a concept of rigidity. It is deemed improper for smaller projects. Here these requirements are being found to changing very fast. Complexities have been pivoting since these staggering quantities of documents are created and then sustained around projects (Orzen & Bell, 2016). PRINCE 2 is the efficient process-based for FIFA 2018 projects. This has been providing easily tailored and scalable solutions to control various types of projects. These types of processes are defined with numerous inputs and outputs with specific aims to be achieved and activities to get carried out. In this way, it is seen that PRINCE 2 has been readily applicable to any area of FIFA. This has been identified and providing various vocabularies about anything included in a project that is useful for fast communication. This is also applicable to different kinds of precise determination of project roles (Messnarz et al., 2018). Development of PRINCE 2 has been driven by feedback from end-users and various specialists of project management and review panels of public sector organisations and private sectors. In this way, they have generated best practices that are flexible enough to receive tailored for specific requirements of different organisations of projects that are considering Agile delivery. Apart from this, FIFA has been compatible with various certifications of project management. Thus technical systems for projects are delivered. This has complemented softer skills learn from different other qualifications.
This system of execution has been using projects, programs and portfolios through enabling practices that are always and predictable to deliver strategies of various sustainable competitive benefits having better results. Further, it has joined tools, knowledge, processes and identified standards to create platforms from where FIFA has fitted those proven tasks for distinct needs and cases of strategies. In the present example of FIFA, OPM has consisted of process resources, knowledge, integrated talents (MacRae, 2014). Irrespective of a situation of a market has ensured stakeholders and functioning to deliver strategies. A project has represented changes in priority for services and operations and products to customers. This has taken place through the difference that FIFA has shown and gained through competitive benefits. The projects have shown how changes have taken place. Integration of resources of FIFA across stakeholders and functions are essential to ensure proper assimilation of rights of projects to be done. They have supplied value under the strategy (Karout & Awasthi, 2017). Organizational project management has required replacing various management systems that are needed to lead and control business effectively. They have assured integration to maximise contribution and to engage to deliver the strategy.
They have created quick feedbacks, consistent adaptation and queries on various effective practices towards iterations. Further, they have adopted processes such as continuous deployment and integration through using tools of automated steps for quickening product uses and releases. Besides, Agile project management is called for teams to analyse time and costs for moving through tasks consistently (Holmemo, Rolfsen & Ingvaldsen, 2018). Further, various burnups can also be sued with velocity charts to calculate those roles. It is done instead of different Gantt Charts and milestones of projects for measuring progress.
Moreover, they are required to make the presence and participation of project managers. These project managers have been necessary for success across traditional methods such as the waterfall model. Role of project managers within APM is distributed among different team members.
The system has highlighting management systems, metrics and methods. As far as methodologies are concerned, this has been helpful in business developments. This has been a proven toolset to achieve transformational change at FIFA. Business development processes have focused on timely execution, analytical rigours. These are data-driven, with client requirements and aligned to operations. The management system has included govern-applies of processes management to ensure sustainable outcomes that have accelerated applications (Hofmann, Gems & Smith, 2018). Six Sigma has consisted of training sessions. These have frequently been taking place across various questions originating from different participants.
DMAIC refers to the effective data-driven quality technique to improve processes. It is always an integral section of Six Sigma Quality Initiative. DMAIC Six Sigma is also applicable as the world cup has observed various defects in processes. They have waited for FIFA’s six sigma projects. Further, they have started six sigma projects. The underpinning ideas behind DMAIX are that whatever they have seen has needed focus (Gillett & Tennent, 2018). Also, they have focused on leading developments. Here, complex factors of success are used for business processes. Possessing six sigma is useful to create the entire process. It is a logical approach to develop a method of business at FIFA. However, it must be reminded that sigma is a statistical term that has measured amount with which processes have deviated. Hence, it is also regarded as the standard deviation process from a mean. This is also helpful for the event to calculate the defects by any means and methods that are eradicated and getting close to zero effects as possible. The managers have been facing issues and efficiencies of business at FIFA (Garza-Reyes, 2015). For overcoming these challenges, they are needed to deploy bet processes and techniques to control and assess the processes. Thus the smartest process to create the outcomes the results has been to develop the entire process.
The essay highlights that there are different ways to implement that are allowed on multi-faced visions. The most important aspect of the lean project of FIFA has been that their products are found to be manufactured within proper time and on customer demand. The study shows that the world cup project has built into six sigma strategy and the underpinning and various driving forces for others are the different unrelenting kinds of pursuits of accuracy within the system. The project management of FIFA is designed through inventory shedding, potentials of waste cutting and quality developments. Here, many ways to operate comfortably, better and faster are demonstrated. The high importance is given to the ethos that is made standard for all processes. However, there are various reasons why the business of FIFA has turned out to be a norm rather than an exception. Despite that, at times difficult tasks with lack of proper appreciation and lean manufacturing have gained momentums. It is spread over upcoming years, since, the core principles of lean project management are universal and thin theosophy is adopted by FIFA. The study helps in developing the data collection methods for lean management process. These are helpful to analyse data collected and means to determine the leading causes of defects and scopes for development. The sources of variation are also understood from here, and the target processes can be developed through designing creative solutions for preventing and fixing problems. The study is useful to know how to create innovative solutions to deploy lean project management through discipline and technology. These developments can be controlled for keeping processes on new courses. Besides the current session of FIFA 2018, gets prevented to be reverted to old ways through this research. However, they need proper documentation, development and implementing of the current plan of monitoring. The event can be institutionalised through modifying structure and systems.
References:
Downing, C. G., & Belt, M. B. (2016). Stress Fracture: Adverse Effects of Lean Initiatives.
Drohomeretski, E., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Garbuio, P. A. D. R. (2014). Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 804-824.
Elias, A. A. (2016). Stakeholder analysis for Lean Six Sigma project management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(4), 394-405.
Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.
Furterer, S. L. (2016). Lean Six Sigma in service: applications and case studies. CRC press.
Galily, Y., & Samuel-Azran, T. (2018). Israel. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Football and Politics (pp. 369-384). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2015). Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6(3), 226-248.
Gillett, A. G., & Tennent, K. D. (2018). Shadow hybridity and the institutional logic of professional sport: Perpetuating a sporting business in times of rapid social and economic change. Journal of Management History, 24(2), 228-259.
Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
Hill, J., Thomas, A. J., Mason-Jones, R. K., & El-Kateb, S. (2018). The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 26-48.
Hofmann, A., Gems, G. R., & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2018). Games and Sporting Events in History: Organisations, Performances and Impact. Routledge.
Holmemo, M. D. Q., Rolfsen, M., & Ingvaldsen, J. A. (2018). Lean thinking: Outside-in, bottom-up? The paradox of contemporary soft lean and consultant-driven lean implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(1-2), 148-160.
Kaiser, M. G., El Arbi, F., & Ahlemann, F. (2015). Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 126-139.
Karout, R., & Awasthi, A. (2017). Improving software quality using Six Sigma DMAIC-based approach: a case study. Business Process Management Journal, 23(4), 842-856.
Lientz, B., & Rea, K. (2016). Breakthrough technology project management. Routledge.
MacRae, B. (2014). LEAN in the Laboratory: A Case Study With Eight Years of Continuous Improvement. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 142(suppl_1), A150-A150.
Messnarz, R., Sechser, B., Höhn, H., Lehmann, V., & Ekert, D. (2018, September). Assessing Agile in Automotive Embedded Development Projects Using Automotive SPICE 3.1. In European Conference on Software Process Improvement (pp. 443-455). Springer, Cham.
Nicholas, J. M., & Steyn, H. (2017). Project management for engineering, business and technology. Routledge.
Orzen, M. A., & Bell, S. C. (2016). Lean IT: Enabling and sustaining your lean transformation. Productivity Press.
Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319-330.
Sears, S. K., Sears, G. A., Clough, R. H., Rounds, J. L., & Segner, R. O. (2015). Construction project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Todorovi?, M. L., Petrovi?, D. ?., Mihi?, M. M., Obradovi?, V. L., & Bushuyev, S. D. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 772-783.
Turner, J. R. (2014). Handbook of project-based management (Vol. 92). New York, NY: McGraw-hill.
Walker, A. (2015). Project management in construction. John Wiley & Sons.