McGrade Luxury House: Architectural Plan Review And Construction Details
Building Segments
McGrade luxury house is another facility that comprise of three building segment that are isolated by slab floors. The basement is meant for parking of vehicle and furthermore it has a segment of support of the lift. The ground floor had three bedrooms, study room, rumpus room, laundry, washrooms and latrine in every room and store room, lastly the first floor that have the replica of ground floor.
During the architectural plan review the following will be considered;
Verification of the loads imposed on the structure due to dead load, fixed equipment, storage, live load.
Comment;
They are all coordinated with structural assumptions.
Verification of adequacy of non-structural components.
− Ceilings and soffits
Comment;
Their connections resist vertical and lateral loads
− Equipment, storage racks, cabinets and casework
Comment;
Their connections resist vertical and lateral
− Parapets, architectural ornamentation and appendages
Comment;
Their connections resist vertical and lateral
Verification of architectural dimensions (thickness of walls, depth of roof structure, etc.).
Comment;
Their coordination are well fitted
Verification of the wood.
Comment
They are all protected against moisture, decay, and termites
Verification of the enclosed spaces
Comment;
They are well adequately ventilated.
Verification of the adequate roof drainage has been provided.
Comment;
They are all provided
The building envelope will contain materials that incorporate block around the base of the working up to a precast banding. The banding will fill in as a change to larger than average brick work boards. Aluminum Cladding is additionally utilized for outside dividers and shade spaces. Customer facing facade style Glass Walls will likewise be utilized all through the McGrade luxury house.
One of the principle highlights of the building will be its Metal Canopy that stretches out finished the Main Entry.
The total project is booked to take around 530 Days. Substructure is anticipated to keep going for around 165 days, superstructure will take around 130 days and the rough in and complete course of events is around 140 days. Building closeout incorporates testing for LEED point confirmation and other testing and parities, and also last punch list work. Final completion is relied upon to be on twentieth December 2018. See Gantt diagram Summary Schedule.
The soil being unstable will expect geopiers to be built under footings to make a high load bearing capacity. Whatever is left of the site and sheds will utilize spread footings.
The area of pool on the back side of the house territory will include the establishment of sheeting and shoring, a mud tangle, and unique water-sealing of the Pool Structure all around.
Architectural Plan Review
Fundamentally the house will be built in three portioned segments of floors.
The Substructure and Superstructure will both take after comparative grouping ways. The basement Section and core of the building will always lead followed by the ground floor and afterward the first floor. By sectioning the calendar all through the procedure teams will have the capacity to be of small sizes and more beneficial, if different exchanges have officially moved out of a specific zone before the following group beginning its work. There is however various exchanges that will require tight joint effort to make progress on this undertaking. The essential illustration being, the Electrical Contractor and Masonry Contractor the same number of square dividers should be roughed in while being built. The Rough-in and finish schedule will follow a similar sequence by starting in the basement, progressing to the ground floor and then finishing in the first floor of building.
Normally in the Australia region the favored strategy for development is cast in place concrete. It is intriguing that the basic framework is mostly standard steel construction. With building height not being a plan constraint, in regard to augmenting number of floors this may have figured into the technique method chosen.
The site permits restricted nearby stopping which is accessible. The encompassing zone is generally private and road stopping will give adequate parking spots amid development.
Numerous construction recycling organizations are accessible to the Queensland area, from aggregate site recycling to arranging and hauling services.
The soil bearing capacity does not require much more than the use of geo-piers in specific areas. Spread footings are adequate in many territories and for segregated structures around sports facilities.
Table 1: Square foot estimates summary
|
Construction cost |
Source |
Construction cost per square meter |
|
$3,994, 992 |
D4 cost estimating |
$170.92 |
|
$4, 120, 400 |
R.S mean |
$213.45 |
|
$8,000,000 |
Actual |
$385.74 |
The project task has a financial plan of $10 million and building expense of $8 million. The genuine building cost per square meter was ascertained to be $386. In Table 1, a correlation with the parametric gauge made utilizing D4 Cost Estimating can be seen; the evaluations made in this report give off an impression of being low.
The genuine building cost considers the numerous civilities and offices made for McGrade extravagance house. In D4 it is entirely taking a gander at square meter and a comparable size of the building.
The gauge utilizing Cost works (RS Means) has brought about a gauge of $4.1 million. The amendments made to the base square meter cost include: changing in accordance with proper story tallness and edge and also some extra civilities. The substantial contrasts can be represented in the distinctions in the plan of the task contrasted with different offices. RS Means square meter cost information can’t represent the numerous pleasantries incorporated into the real development expenses of McGrade luxury house.
Verification of Loads and Components
Table 2: MEP and structural cost estimates summary *Estimated Values
|
System |
System cost |
% total |
Cost per square meter |
|
Mechanical |
$5,000, 000* |
16 |
$60.50 |
|
Electrical |
$3,000,000 |
12 |
$48.67 |
|
Structure |
$2,000,000* |
4 |
$16.75 |
The McGrade luxury house is presently anticipated to meet LEED Gold under LEED for Program. This rating will be accomplished by concentrating on Indoor Air Quality and Optimizing Energy Performance. A huge segment of the rooftop (more than 40%) will be broad green rooftop gardens, while the rest of the territories will be an exceptionally intelligent EPDM roofing material. Summary of the LEED can be seen below in Table 3.
Table 3: LEED 2009 New construction and major renovation
|
LEED 2009 New construction and major renovation |
|||
|
Categories |
points planned to be earned |
||
|
yes |
may be |
No |
|
|
maintainable site |
15 |
2 |
6 |
|
Water Efficiency |
10 |
3 |
0 |
|
Atmosphere and Energy |
11 |
0 |
19 |
|
Resources and materials |
7 |
1 |
5 |
|
Quality Indoor Environmental |
15 |
0 |
3 |
|
Design Process and Innovation |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
Credits of Regional Priority |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
61 |
7 |
35 |
|
gold = 60 to 79 points |
The analysis begins with an examination concerning the green rooftop. Where the properties of the green rooftop examination included: cost, warm effectiveness, storm water stockpiling limit, weight, and construction span. Warm properties of the green rooftop framework are extremely intricate and will require cautious and innovative contemplations. Construction term for the rooftop framework can be diminished strikingly. At last, cost will be computed with changes and effects of alternate frameworks to decide the feasibility of taking out the green rooftop. To finish up this analysis taking LEED affirmation, Value Engineering and Schedule Reduction into thought will decide the dangers and openings related with Optimizing Value Engineering.
Green rooftops give numerous focal points and burdens that should all be considered when choosing on the off chance that it is a reasonable choice for a material gathering. A couple of favorable circumstances to green rooftops are: storm water administration properties, goes about as a warm mass, capacity to clean the air and conceivable long haul vitality funds. A few inconveniences are: high introductory costs, expanded rooftop dead loads, support concerns and exorbitant repairs if required.
The drawings or sheets listed on the cover or index sheet
This drawing, page of specifications/calculations have been set up by other plan experts or advisors who are authorized and additionally approved to get ready such illustrations in this state. It has been analyzed by me for: 1) outline plan and seems to meet the suitable prerequisites of Title 24, California Code of Regulations and the task determinations arranged by me, and
2) Coordination with my plans and determinations and is adequate for joining into the development of this undertaking.
The Statement of General Conformance “might not be understood as calming me of my rights, obligations, and duties under Sections 17302 and 81138 of the Education Code and Sections
4-336, 4-341 and 4-344” of Title 24, Part 1. (Title 24, Part 1, Section 4-317 (b))
|
I find that: All drawings or sheets listed on the cover or index sheet This drawing or page |
|||
|
is/are in general conformance with the project design, and has/have been coordinated with the project plans and specifications. |
is/are in general conformance with the project design intent, and has/have been coordinated with the project plans and specifications. |
||
|
Signature |
Date |
Signature |
Date |
|
Architect or Engineer designated to be in general responsible charge |
Architect or Engineer delegated responsibility for this portion of the work |
||
|
Print Name |
Print Name |
||
|
License Number 342 |
Expiration Date 02/02/2019 |
License Number |
Expiration Date |
Building Envelope
Time Schedules of activities
Table 4: Time schedule of activities
|
Activities number |
Descriptions |
Duration |
Early start |
Early finish |
Late start |
Late finish |
Total float |
Free float |
|
5 |
PROJECT NOTICE APPROVAL |
3 |
26 may 2018 |
28 may 2018 |
26 may 2018 |
28 may 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
DEVELOP WORK PLAN |
7 |
29 may 2018 |
6 June 2018 |
29 may 2018 |
6 June 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
15 |
FORM PROJECT TEAM |
5 |
9 June 2018 |
13 June 2018 |
9 June 2018 |
13 June 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
20 |
DESIGN CONTRACTOR’S WORK |
2 |
16 June 2018 |
17 June 2018 |
25 June 2018 |
26 June 2018 |
7 |
0 |
|
25 |
IN-HOUSF: DESIGN WORK |
3 |
16 June 2018 |
18 June 2018 |
16 June 2018 |
18 June 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
30 |
DESIGN BRIEFING MEETING |
1 |
18 June 2018 |
18 June 2018 |
27 June 2018 |
27 June 2018 |
7 |
0 |
|
35 |
PROJECT SITE-WORK DESIGN |
1 |
19 June 2018 |
19 June 2018 |
25 June 2018 |
25 June 2018 |
4 |
0 |
|
40 |
ON-SITE UTILITIES DESIGN |
1 |
19 June 2018 |
19 June 2018 |
7 Aug 2018 |
7 Aug 2018 |
35 |
0 |
|
45 |
A/E DESIGN BUILDING A |
1 |
19 June 2018 |
19 June 2018 |
19 June 2018 |
19 June 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
50 |
FLOOR PLAN GROUND |
10 |
20 June 2018 |
3 July 2018 |
30 June 2018 |
11 June 2018 |
7 |
0 |
|
55 |
SITE GRADING PLAN |
12 |
20 June 2018 |
7 July 2018 |
26 June 2018 |
11 June 2018 |
4 |
0 |
|
60 |
STORM-WATER DESIGN |
10 |
20 June 2018 |
3 July 2018 |
8 Aug 2018 |
21 Aug 2018 |
35 |
0 |
|
65 |
FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR |
15 |
20 June 2018 |
10 July 2018 |
20 June 2018 |
10 June 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
70 |
FOUND/STRUCT OF THE BUILDING |
45 |
3 July 2018 |
3 Sep 2018 |
22 June 2018 |
22 Sep 2018 |
13 |
0 |
|
75 |
ARCH FINISHES OF THE BUILDING |
30 |
3 July 2018 |
13 Aug 2018 |
12 Aug 2018 |
22 Sep 2018 |
28 |
15 |
|
80 |
SANITARY SEWER DESIGN |
21 |
10 July 2018 |
1 Aug 2018 |
10 July 2018 |
1 Aug 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
85 |
DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM |
7 |
5 Sep 2018 |
12 Sep 2018 |
5 Sep 2018 |
12 Sep 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
90 |
PLUMBING. |
10 |
2 Oct 2018 |
12 Oct 2018 |
2 Oct 2018 |
12 Oct 2018 |
0 |
0 |
|
95 |
FINAL INSPECTION & APPROVAL |
3 |
3 Dec 2018 |
6 Dec 2018 |
3 Dec 2018 |
6 Dec 2018 |
0 |
0 |
Table 5: Cost of schedules of activities
|
Activities number |
Descriptions |
Duration |
Cost |
|
5 |
APPROVAL OF PROJECT NOTICE |
3 |
$500 |
|
10 |
WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT |
7 |
$1200 |
|
15 |
FORMATION OF PROJECT TEAM |
5 |
$850 |
|
20 |
CONTRACTOR’S WORK DESIGN |
2 |
$3000 |
|
25 |
IN-HOUSF: DESIGN WORK |
3 |
$1500 |
|
30 |
BRIF MEETING ON DESIGN |
1 |
$1200 |
|
35 |
WORK DESIGN ON PROJECT SITE |
1 |
$1400 |
|
40 |
ON-SITE UTILITIES DESIGN |
1 |
$1200 |
|
45 |
A/E DESIGN BUILDING A |
1 |
$1500 |
|
50 |
FLOOR PLAN GROUND |
10 |
$9000 |
|
55 |
PLAN OF SITE GRADING |
12 |
$14000 |
|
60 |
STORM-WATER DESIGN |
10 |
$2000 |
|
65 |
FIRST FLOOR FLOOR PLAN |
15 |
$26000 |
|
70 |
FOUND/STRUCT OF THE BUILDING |
45 |
$31200 |
|
75 |
ARCH FINISHES OF THE BUILDING |
30 |
$49000 |
|
80 |
DESIGN OF SANITARY SEWER |
21 |
$12000 |
|
85 |
DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM |
7 |
$9000 |
|
90 |
PLUMBING. |
10 |
$28500 |
|
95 |
FINAL INSPECTION & APPROVAL |
3 |
$3500 |
Table 6: list of activities Project: 060608/WBS-1 Pacific Motorway
|
CONCEPT PHASE |
|
Project Management |
|
Appoint Project Manager |
|
Community Engagement |
|
Project Proposal |
|
Determination of a functional Necessities and Scope |
|
Project Proposal production |
|
Development of Options Analysis and Recommendations |
|
Develop Concept Planning Brief |
|
Procure Concept Planning Consultant |
|
Produce Options Analysis and Recommendations |
|
Recommend Preferred Option |
|
Approved Recommended Option |
|
Develop Preferred Option |
|
Business Case |
|
Review Risk Register and Project Estimate |
|
Produce Business Case |
|
Financial Approval |
|
DEVELOPMENT PHASE |
|
Project Management |
|
Project Management General |
|
Development Phase |
|
Prepare Design Brief |
|
Community Engagement Development Phase |
|
Preliminary Design |
|
Procure Preliminary Design Consultants |
|
Produce Preliminary Design |
|
Detailed Design |
|
Procure Detailed Design Consultants |
|
Obtain Legislative Approvals and Permits |
|
Produce Detailed Design |
|
Contract Documents |
|
Produce Contract Documents |
|
Pre-tender Financial Approval |
|
Preliminary Works |
|
Obtain Approval for Preliminary Works |
|
Acquire Right of Way |
|
Procure Public Utility Plant (PUP) Services |
|
Procurement |
|
Engage Contract Administrator |
|
Procure Contractor |
|
Contract Financial Approval |
|
Contract Award |
|
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE |
|
Project Management |
|
Project Management (General) |
|
Implementation Phase |
|
Community Engagement Implementation Phase |
|
Contract Administration |
|
Practical Completion Certificate |
|
Construction |
|
Principal’s Responsibility |
|
Official Opening |
|
FINALISATION PHASE |
|
Project Management |
|
Project Management (General) |
|
Finalization Phase |
|
Defects Liability Period |
|
Final Certificate |
|
Community Engagement – Finalisation Phase |
|
Complete Project Handover Report |
|
Evaluate Project Performance |
|
Post Implementation Review |
|
Close Out Consultation |
Statement and Construction Project Budget approved.
Facility Budget
Site-Work.. …………………. $522,400
Grading
Paving
Landscaped
On-Site Utilities ………………. $1 73,700
Storm water
Sanitary Sewer
Domestic Water
Underground Electrical
Natural Gas
Maintenance Building……….. .$1,083,600
Architectural
Structural
Electrical
Plumbing
Heat & Air
Project Management………….. $19,350
Clerical
Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1 57,000
Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1 57,000
Crane
Elevators
Construction Bids
Total Directs = $3,053,150
Contingency ………………… $1 50,000
Total Approved Budget = $3,203,150
A/E Building Architectural
Dan Milter plot plan
Architectural floor plan
Plot plan sanitary sewer site improvement
Floor plan – fencing structural
Electricity – landscaping foundation
Structural Water paving
Foundation Domestic – sub base mechanical
Fire protection concrete plumbing
Mechanical Telephone – parking /walk heat and air
Plumbing Domestic electrical
Heat and air Security aggregate finish
Electrical
Finishes
Work package
Title: Maintenance Building
WBS: 20021
Scope
Required scope of work: Architectural
Service to be provided: floor plan drawing
Services not included in this Work Package, but included in another work package:
House units drawing plan
Services not included in this Work Package, but will be performed by:
Budget
Table 7: showing Budget
|
Personnel assign to the job |
Work – hours |
$-cost |
CBS code Acct |
Computer services |
||
|
Type |
Hour |
$-cost |
||||
|
Fredrick James |
10 |
$20 |
2345 |
Typing and printing |
6 |
$5 |
Schedule
Table 8: Schedule
|
OBS Code |
Task of Work |
Accountable person |
Date to start |
Date to end |
|
2376 |
Floor plan drawing |
Fredrick James |
16 June 2018 |
18 June 2018 |
Work package: start date: 16 June 2018 end date: 16 June 2018
Additional comment: The work must be completed as agreed in all terms and conditions
Prepared by: Peter Kelvin Date: 02 march 2018
Approved by: David Jones Date: 05 march 2018
Critical Path Method (CPM) diagram for service facility project
Bored excavation for 300mm diameter piers
Table 9: Total volume is calculated by considering bulking factor of soil
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$Cost |
|
1 |
Bored excavation volume for 53 Ø300mm and 2.5m deep piers Cross sectional area of pier = πr2 = π x 0.152 = 0.07m2 Volume of pier = cross sectional area x depth = 0.07 x 2.5 = 0.18m3 Volume of 53 piers = 0.18m3 x 53 = 9.54m3 Assume bulking factor of 1.4 (clay soil), total volume of soil material to be excavated for boring of piers = 1.4 x 9.54 = 13.6m3 |
m3 |
14 |
$53571.43 |
$750,000 |
A total of 53 53 Ø300mm and 2.5m deep pier bores shall be excavated. For all the 53 piers, a total volume of about 14m3 of soil material will be excavated for the piers to be bored.
Table 10: Bulk excavation for general site preparation
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ Cost |
|
2 |
Bulk excavation |
m3 |
150 |
$3,533.33 |
$530,000 |
|
Overall bulk area of excavation (plus working space) = (12.83 + 4.08 + 2.00) x (11.87 + 2.00) = 18.91 x 13.87 = 262.28 Estimated depths at corners: NE – 0.69m, NW – 0.55m, SE – 0.50 and SW – 0.45) Average depth = (0.690 + 0.54 + 0.45 + 0.40)/4 = 0.55m Volume of bulk excavation = area x depth = 262.28m2 x 0.55m = 144.25 Assume that only one side is battered = 18.91m x 1.0m wide x 0.55m = 10.40m3 Since battering is done at 45 degrees, battered volume is = 0.5 x 10.40 = 5.20 Total volume of bulk excavation = 144.25 + 5.20 = 149.45 |
A total of 150m3 of shall be excavated from the site during general preparation of the site. This bulk volume includes working space, which extends outside the building towards the boundary by 1m. The longest side of the building shall also be battered at an angle of 45 degrees and a width of 1m from the building. The total bulk volume of 150m3 to be excavated includes the actual site of the house, working space and battered volume. The subcontractor has to use this value to determine the most suitable equipment to use for bulk excavation and if the excavated material will have to be cart away.
Project Timeline and Methodology
N25 concrete for the ground slab (beams, patio slab and pad footings)
Thickness of slab = 150mm = 0.15m
Thickness of beam = 450mm = 0.35m
Width of beam = 100mm = 0.1m
Table 11: N25 concrete for the ground slab (beams, patio slab and pad footings
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
3 |
N25 Concrete for ground slab |
m3 |
|||
|
Slab on ground = length x width x slab thickness = 12.83m x 11.87m x 0.15m = 22.84 |
m3 |
23 |
|||
|
Patio slab = length x width x thickness = 6.35m x 1.67m x 0.15m = 1.59 |
m3 |
2 |
|||
|
Family room = length x width x thickness = 5.51m x 4.08m x 0.15m = 3.37 |
m3 |
4 |
|||
|
Beams on slab = total length of beams x width of beam x depth of beam = 82.82m x 0.1m x 0.45m = 3.73 |
m3 |
4 |
|||
|
Pad Footings Area = 10(1.2 x 0.9) + (0.35 x 2.4) = 10.80 + 0.84 = 11.64m2 Volume = area x depth = 11.64 x 0.35 = 4.074 |
m3 |
5 |
|||
|
Total |
m3 |
38 |
$22,894.74 |
$870,000 |
A total volume of 38m3 of N25 concrete shall be required for the whole ground slab, including beams, patio slab and pad footings but excluding piers. Depending on the mix design recommended by the engineer, it noes becomes easier to determine the volume of concrete ingredients (concrete, coarse and fine aggregates and sand) needed for the ground slab.
SL72 reinforcing mesh for the ground slabs
Table 12: SL72 reinforcing mesh for the ground slabs
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
4 |
Number of SL72 Reinforcing Mesh Sheets |
||||
|
4 (a) |
Area of ground slab to be reinforced with mesh (including 50mm cover) = length x width = 11.98m x 11.02m = 132.02m2 Area of family room to be reinforced with mesh = length x width = 4.66m x 3.68m = 17.15m2 Total area of slab to be covered = 132.02 + 17.15 = 149.17m2 |
m2 |
150 |
$6,000 |
$900,000 |
|
4 (b) |
Number of sheets = total area of slab/ effective area of SL72 Total area of slab to be reinforced with SL72 mesh = 150m2 Effective area of SL72 sheet = 5.8m x 2.2m = 12.76m2 Number of SL reinforcing mesh sheets = 150/12.76 = 11.76 |
No |
12 |
Summary:
The total area of slab that requires to be covered by the SL72 reinforcing mesh is 150m2. Based on this area (and putting into consideration the required overlap length and cover at the edges), the number of 6.0m x 2.4m with 400mm lap SL72 reinforcing sheets required to complete the slab is 12.
Table 14: Lengths of SL12TM for ground slab construction
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
5 |
Length and number of SL12TM Trench Mesh |
||||
|
5 (a) |
Length of trench mesh (including 200mm lap) = length of one trench x number of trenches = 13.23m x 3 = 39.69m = length of one trench x number of trenches = 12.27m x 3 = 36.81m = length of one trench x number of trenches = 4.48m x 2 = 8.96m = length of one trench x number of trenches = 5.91m x 1 = 5.91m Total length of trench mesh = 39.69 + 36.81 + 8.96 + 5.91 = 91.37 |
m |
92 |
$13,043.48 |
$1,200,000 |
|
5 (b) |
Number of SL12TM trench mesh 16 sheets = Length of trenches/length of trench sheets = 92/6 = 15.33 |
No |
16 |
||
The total length of SL12TM trench mesh needed for ground lab (including overlap of 200mm at each end) is 92m. Since each trench measure comes in 6m lengths, the number of lengths of SL12TM trench mesh needed is 16. Therefore the contractor will have to supply 16 sheets of 6m long SL12TM trench mesh.
Table 15: Structural steel
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
6 |
Structural steel |
tonnes |
1.78 |
$1,432,584.3 |
$2,550,000 |
|
B1 Weight = 25.7kg/m x 12.83m = 329.73kg |
|||||
|
B2 Weight = 32kg/m x 12.83m = 410.56kg |
|||||
|
B3 Weight = 14kg/m x 11.87m = 166.18kg |
|||||
|
B4 Weight = 14kg/m x 11.87m = 166.18kg |
|||||
|
B6 Weight = 14kg/m x 11.87m = 166.18kg |
|||||
|
B5 Weight = 31.6kg/m x 12.83m = 405.43kg |
|||||
|
L1 Weight = 14.6kg/m x 4.08m = 59.57kg |
|||||
|
L2 Weight = 14.6kg/m x 5.51m = 80.45kg |
|||||
|
Total weight = 329.73 + 410.56 + 166.18 + 166.18 + 166.18 + 405.43 + 59.57 + 80.45 = 1784.28kg |
Summary:
The total weight of structural steel needed for the project is 1.78 tonnes.
Plasterboard
Table 16: Plasterboard
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
7 |
Plasterboard |
||||
|
7 (a) |
Area of plasterboard Assume that the height of plasterboard wall is 2.4m Area of wall = length of wall x height of wall A1 = 11.93m x 2.4m = 28.63m2 A2 = 11.93m x 2.4m = 28.63m2 A3 = 11.93m x 2.4m = 28.63m2 A4 = 11.93m x 2.4m = 28.63m2 A5 = 10.97m x 2.4m = 26.33m2 A6 = 10.97m x 2.4m = 26.33m2 A7 = 10.97m x 2.4m = 26.33m2 A8 = 10.97m x 2.4m = 26.33m2 A9 = 3.63m x 2.4m = 8.71m2 A10 = 3.63m x 2.4m = 8.71m2 A11 = 4.61m x 2.4m = 11.06m2 A12 = 4.61m x 2.4m = 11.06m2 Total area of walls = 4(28.63) + 4(26.33) + 2(8.71) + 2(11.06) = 259.38m2 Deduct area of doors and windows Total area of doors = 5(2m x 0.9m) = 9.00m2 Area of windows = 6(1.2m x 0.8m) = 5.76m2 Total area of doors and windows = 9.00 + 5.76 = 14.76m2 Net measure = 259.38 – 14.76 = 244.62m2 |
m2 |
245 |
$1,632.7 |
$400,000 |
|
7 (b) |
Number of plasterboard sheets The selected size of plasterboard sheets is 1200mm wide and 2400mm long Area of one plasterboard sheet = 1.2m x 2.4m = 2.88m2 Number of sheets = net measure of wall/area of one sheet = 245m2/2.88m2 =85.07 |
No |
86 |
Summary:
The total area of wall that will be covered with plasterboard is 245m2 and a total of 86 plasterboard sheets measuring 1200mm wide and 2400mm long shall be required for the project.
66x18mm finished DAR primed pine skirting
Table 17: 66x18mm finished DAR primed pine skirting
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
8 |
66x18mm finished DAR primed pine skirting |
||||
|
8 (a) |
Length of skirting L1 = 11.93m L2 = 11.93m L3 = 11.93m L4 = 11.93m L5 = 10.97m L6 = 10.97m L7 = 10.97m L8 = 10.97m L9 = 3.63m L10 = 3.63m L11 = 4.61m L12 = 4.61m Total length of skirting = 4(11.93) + 4(10.97) + 2(3.63) + 2(4.61) = 108.08m Plus 5% wastage Total length of skirting (including wastage) = 1.05 x 108.08 = 113.48 |
m |
114 |
$2,631.58 |
$300,000 |
|
8 (b) |
Number of skirting lengths The selected length of 66x18mm finished DAR primed pine skirting is 2.7m Number of skirting lengths = length of skirting/ selected length of skirting L1: 11.93m/2.7m = 4.42 = 5 sheets L2: 11.93m/2.7m = 4.42 = 5 sheets L3: 11.93m/2.7m = 4.42 = 5 sheets L4: 11.93m/2.7m = 4.42 = 5 sheets L5: 10.97m/2.7m = 4.06 = 5 sheets L6: 10.97m/2.7m = 4.06 = 5 sheets L7: 10.97m/2.7m = 4.06 = 5 sheets L8: 10.97m/2.7m = 4.06 = 5 sheets L9: 3.63m/2.7m = 1.34 = 2 sheets L10: 3.63m/2.7m = 1.34 = 2 sheets L11: 4.61m/2.7m = 1.71 = 2 sheets L12: 4.61m/2.7m = 1.71 = 2 sheets Total sheets = 8(5) + 4(2) = 48 |
No |
48 |
Summary:
The total length of skirting is 114m and a total of 48 lengths of 66x18mm finished DAR primed pine skirting measuring 2.7m long shall be required for the project.
Table 18: Ceramic floor tiles
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$ C |
|
9 |
Ceramic floor tiles |
||||
|
9 (a) |
Amount of ceramic floor tiles Family room = 4.08m x 5.51m = 22.48m2 Plus 10% wastage = 1.10 x 22.48m2 = 24.73m2 ≈ 25m2 Meals room = 2.43m x 4.68m = 11.37m2 Plus 10% wastage = 1.10 x 11.37m2 = 12.51m2 ≈ 13m2 Kitchen Floor tiles: 4.59m x 6.11m = 28.04m2 Plus 10% wastage = 1.10 x 28.04m2 = 30.85m2 Wall tiles (under cupboards) = 2(4.59m x 1.8m) + 2(6.11m x 1.8m) = 38.52m2 Plus 10% wastage = 1.10 x 38.52m2 = 42.37m2 Total kitchen = 30.85 + 42.37 = 73.22m2 ≈ 74m2 Foyer/stair area = 1.71m x 1.09m = 1.86m2 Plus 10% wastage = 1.10 x 1.86m2 = 2.05m2 ≈ 3m2 Total = 25 + 13 + 74 + 3 = 115 |
m2 |
115 |
$6,956.52 |
$800,000 |
|
9 (b) (i) |
Number of boxes of floor tiles Number of boxes of floor tiles = area of floor tiles/1.2m2 = (25 + 13 + 31 + 3)/1.2 = 72m2/1.2m2 = 60 |
No |
60 |
||
|
9 (b) (ii) |
Number of boxes of wall tiles Number of wall tiles = area of wall tiles/1.4m2 = 43m2/1.4m2 = 30.71 |
No |
31 |
Summary:
A total area of 115m2 (including family room, meals room, kitchen and foyer/stair area) shall be tiled. 60 boxes of floor tiles and 31 boxes of wall tiles shall be required for the project.
Table 19: External opening
|
Item |
Particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
$cost |
|
10 |
External opening Door frames, windows and finishes |
m2 |
672.5 |
$892.19 |
$600,000 |
|
Wrot mahogany Rebated frame 200 mm * 50 mm = 0.2 m * 0.05 m = 0.01 m2 Number of frame = 3000 Quantity = 0.01 * 3000 = 30 m2 Architrave 50 mm * 25 mm = 0.05 m * 0.025 m = 0.00125 m2 Total number = 1000 Quantity = 0.00125 * 1000 = 1.25 m2 Total area = 30 + 1.25 = 31.25 Number of doors = 22 Total area = 31. 25 m2 * 22 = 627.5 m2 Carpenter rate per hour = $45 Total time taken = 15 hours Total labor cost = 15 hours * $45 = $675 Windows Windows size = 1500 mm * 1500 mm = 2250000 mm2 Number of windows = 20 Total area = 20 * 2250000 mm2 = 45000000mm2 = 45 m2 Windows board 125 mm * 25 mm = 3125 mm2 Curtain rod 25 mm diameter chrome curtain rod 20 mm diameter curtain Number of curtain rod = 6 Fixing of curtain rod = 6 hours Rate of fixing curtain rod per hour = $3 Total cost = 6 hours * $3 = $18 |
|
Table 20: plumbing cost
|
Plumbing |
||||
|
Item particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
Cost |
|
A Plumbing work to Powder, Laundry, ensuite and Bathroom areas including the supply and fixing of all fittings. |
||||
|
B Supply prices from provided PC schedule |
||||
|
C Labour constants per Rawlinson 2014 |
||||
|
D Toilet suites to areas as noted; |
No |
4 |
$25,600 |
$102,400 |
|
Powder – 1 |
||||
|
Laundry – 1 |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
4 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $600 |
||||
|
Labour 2.50 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $25,600 |
||||
|
$800 each WC pan and cistern |
||||
|
E Shower bases to areas as noted; |
No |
3 |
$30,500 |
$91,500 |
|
Powder – 1 |
||||
|
Laundry Nil |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
3 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $500 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,500 |
||||
|
Per shower base |
||||
|
F Baths to areas as noted; |
No |
1 |
$20,750 |
$20,750 |
|
Bathroom -1 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $750 |
||||
|
Labour 2.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $20,000 |
||||
|
$20,750 |
||||
|
Per bath |
||||
|
Total |
$214,650 |
Table 21: Drainage cost
|
Drainage |
||||
|
Item particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
Cost |
|
A Drainage work to Powder, Laundry, ensuite and Bathroom areas including the supply and fixing of all fittings. |
||||
|
B Supply prices from provided PC schedule |
||||
|
C Labour constants per Rawlinson 2014 |
||||
|
D Toilet suites to areas as noted; |
No |
5 |
$50,600 |
$253,000 |
|
Powder – 2 |
||||
|
Laundry – 1 |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
5 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $600 |
||||
|
Labour 5 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $50,000 |
||||
|
$50,600 |
||||
|
E Shower bases to areas as noted; |
No |
4 |
$30,500 |
$122,000 |
|
Powder – 2 |
||||
|
Laundry Nil |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
4 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $500 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,500 |
||||
|
Per shower base |
||||
|
F Baths to areas as noted; |
No |
1 |
$30,750 |
$30,750 |
|
Bathroom -1 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $750 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,750 |
||||
|
Per bath |
||||
|
Total |
$405,750 |
Table 22: electricity cost
|
Electricity |
||||
|
Item particulars |
Unit |
Quantity |
Rate |
Cost |
|
A Toilet suites to areas as noted; |
No |
4 |
$30,600 |
$122,400 |
|
Powder – 1 |
||||
|
Laundry – 1 |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
4 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $600 |
||||
|
Labour 3 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,600 |
||||
|
B Shower bases to areas as noted; |
No |
3 |
$30,500 |
$91,500 |
|
Powder – 1 |
||||
|
Laundry Nil |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
3 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $500 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,500 |
||||
|
Per shower base |
||||
|
C Baths to areas as noted; |
No |
1 |
$20,750 |
$20,700 |
|
Bathroom -1 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $750 |
||||
|
Labour 2.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $20,000 |
||||
|
$20,750 |
||||
|
Per bath |
||||
|
D Hot tub areas as noted; |
2 |
$30,500 |
$61,000 |
|
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
3 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $500 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,500 |
||||
|
E Tape ware areas as noted; |
No |
3 |
$21,000 |
$63,000 |
|
Laundry -1 |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
3 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $1000 |
||||
|
Labour 2.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $20,000 |
||||
|
$21,000 |
||||
|
Vanity areas as noted; |
No |
3 |
$20,000 |
$60,000 |
|
Laundry -1 |
||||
|
Ensuite – 1 |
||||
|
Bathroom – 1 |
||||
|
3 |
||||
|
Supply (PC) $600 |
||||
|
Labour 3.00 hrs @ $10,000/hr = $30,000 |
||||
|
$30,600 |
||||
|
Total |
418,600 |
The approximate total cost of the project of building McGrade luxury house is $10 million
Table 23: Risk management plan for program delays
|
Sub risk: Mean and standard deviation |
|
1 Shortage of skilful workers 4.58 |
|
SD = 3.61 |
|
2 Time constraint 4.12 |
|
SD = 4.58 |
|
3 Sub-contractor correlated challenges 3.94 |
|
SD = 5.72 |
|
4 Project interruption 3.94 |
|
SD = 6.39 |
|
5 Inappropriate authentication of contract documents 3.83 |
|
SD = 3.6 |
|
6 Competition offered by other corporations 3.51 |
|
SD = 6.31 |
|
7 Inappropriate project scheduling and budgeting 3.25 |
|
SD = 2.92 |
|
8 materials price increase 3.07 |
|
SD = 4.73 |
|
9 Loss resulted to variation of rate of inflation 3.05 |
|
SD = 3.45 |
|
10 Communication problem between clients 3.03 |
|
SD = 4.47 |
|
11 Loss resulted to variation of interest rate 2.99 |
|
SD = 6.17 |
|
12 Increased cost of labour 2.95 |
|
SD = 6.88 |
|
13 Shortage of Materials 2.94 |
|
SD = 4.82 |
|
14 Internal problems of management 2.93 |
|
SD = 4.19 |
|
15 Contract breached by project partner 2.91 |
|
SD = 1.99 |
|
16 Inappropriate feasibility study of project 2.86 |
|
SD = 5.07 |
|
17 Unfamiliar conditions of site 2.83 |
|
SD = 2.32 |
|
18 Inappropriate organization structure of a project 2.79 |
|
SD = 3.99 |
|
19 Loss resulted from fuel prices rise 2.75 |
|
SD = 5.5 |
|
20 Design changes 2.74 |
|
SD = 3.76 |
|
21 Distance of site from urban area 2.6 |
|
SD = 6.27 |
|
22 Team work 2.56 |
|
SD = 3.52 |
|
23 Design drawings errors 2.53 |
|
SD = 4.78 |
|
24Project adverse impact due to climatic condition 2.5 |
|
SD = 4.24 |
|
25 The project having no past similar experience 2.45 |
|
SD = 2.97 |
|
26 Procured materials having poor quality 2.39 |
|
SD = 3.48 |
|
27 material wasted by workers 2.3 |
|
SD = 4.19 |
|
28 Changes of Government policies increasing cost 2.24 |
|
SD = 3.37 |
|
29 Methodological risk 2.15 |
|
SD = 6.18 |
|
30 Lack negotiation clause in agreement 2.13 |
|
SD = 7.1 |
|
31 Poor disputes and relations with partner 2.09 |
|
SD = 3.76 |
|
32 High point of difficulty in construction 2.07 |
|
SD = 5.04 |
|
33 Inflexible environmental regulations 1.93 |
|
SD = 3.67 |
|
34 Ineffectiveness of transportation amenities 1.84 |
|
SD = 2.98 |
|
35 Deficiency in supply of water 1.78 |
|
SD = 4.93 |
|
36 Failure in Equipment 1.77 |
|
SD = 3.12 |
|
37 Insufficient project partner choice 1.73 |
|
SD = 2.23 |
|
38 Loss due to bureaucracy for late approvals 1.73 |
|
SD = 1.49 |
|
39 Disputes due to architect verses structural engineer 1.73 |
|
SD = 4.84 |
|
40 Excess materials handling 1.71 |
|
SD = 3.78 |
|
41 Government standards and codes 1.7 |
|
SD = 4.95 |
|
42 Project partner bankruptcy 1.69 |
|
SD = 7.53 |
|
43 Site accidents 1.57 |
|
SD = 3.52 |
|
44 Accessory facilities price increase 1.54 |
|
SD = 3.65 |
|
45 Loss resulted from variation of exchange rate 1.43 |
|
SD = 3.34 |
|
46 Top management changes1.43 |
|
SD = 2.54 |
|
47 Supply on fuel shortage 1.43 |
|
SD = 1.38 |
Conclusion
The analysis conducted on McGrade house over has created and considered elective alternatives that enhance the first outline and development design. The last report fills in as the perfection of this analysis and a wellspring of thoughts for future undertakings. The discoveries and analysis are not planned at all to discover imperfections or saw botches in the genuine task.
Building Information Modeling can be an extremely significant apparatus and process in building development. Through the Building Information Modeling Execution Planning Guide, created at Penn State, enables the greatest incentive to be accomplished with BIM. The McGrade house Project Team utilized BIM adequately on the task.
Esteem Engineering is the procedure that incorporates creating and assessing elective construction strategies and systems to increase the value of a venture. In Analysis two the recommendation of LEED components being prohibited from the esteem designing procedure investigates a potential circumstance if the green rooftop was incorporated into the esteem building process. Through expulsion of the green rooftop, expanding the R-Value of the rooftop gathering and extending the grey-water framework, esteem was hypothetically included through a cost reserve funds and lessening of Potable water use in the activity of the building. Also the green rooftop stack on the structure will be evacuated permitting the size and weight of the steel encircling individuals to be decreased.
References
DelPico, W. (2012). Estimating Building Costs for the Residential and Light Commercial Construction Professional. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Peterson, S. ( 2014). Estimating in Building Construction. Chicago: Pearson Education.
ASI Spray Insulation Professionals.(2011). Fireproofing + Thermal Insulation=Energy Savings and Protection: https://www.asispray.com.
Border, T. (2011). Transportation Cost Information. (N. Diehl, Interviewer)
Clark, P. (2011). Metal Stud Crete-Earl Corporation. (N. Diehl, Interviewer)
Computer Integrated Construction Research Program. (2010). Building Information Modeling Project Execution Planning Guide.
District of Columbia Department of Energy. (2011). Green Roofs in the District – Showcase Projects: https://ddoe.dc.gov/ddoe.
Gamino, T. (2011). Electrical Rough in Informtion. (N. Diehl, Interviewer)
Greensulate. (2011). Green Roof Diagram and Research. What is a Green Roof?: https://www.greensulate.com.