I-Crop – Online Cash Marketplace For Grains
Project Information
This report depicts the role of implementation of a successful website platform or the online crop buyers and sellers. It is expected that this platform designed for I-Crop will allow the clients to buy crop through online channel. The area of impact of ranking and the involved stakeholders are also illustrated in this report.
Desired areas of impact
Area of Impact |
Rank (1 from 5) |
Consumers: I-Crop consumers are the most important individual assets who buy products directly from the providers and avail services also. It will successfully influence the advertisement and marketing team members. |
1 |
Operation: In order to successfully run the applications the operations are to be incorporated considering the basic needs of the project. |
2 |
Social: While operating the website proper social support is mandatory for the success of the project to significantly resolve the administrative errors. |
4 |
Strategy: Professional business strategies will help the owners to gain high competitive advantages and commercial revenues as well. |
3 |
Financial: The more technical advancement is possible as much capital will be invested for the project. It is defined that, the system will successfully implemented if proper financial support is incorporated to it. |
5 |
Involved stakeholders to the project
Stakeholder |
Expectation |
Project manager |
To complete the project within budget and time |
Finance manager |
Positive feasibility study |
System developer |
Develop a secured and user friendly system for the users |
Tester |
Test the website for I-Crop before launching |
The project should have to be completed within 8 months.
Project scope
- Project objectives and goals understanding
- The platform should have a feedback option for change management
- Affordable service should be avail by the project owners
- Online payment option should be possessed by the website platform.
Project schedule
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
Resource Names |
Cost |
0 |
Project schedule for I -Crop |
163 days |
Fri 2/2/18 |
Tue 9/18/18 |
$79,128.00 |
||
1 |
Project initiation phase |
37 days |
Fri 2/2/18 |
Mon 3/26/18 |
$18,864.00 |
||
1.1 |
Requirements gathering |
5 days |
Fri 2/2/18 |
Thu 2/8/18 |
Resource manager ,Project manager ,Marketing manager |
$4,080.00 |
|
1.2 |
requirements analysis |
6 days |
Fri 2/9/18 |
Fri 2/16/18 |
2 |
Technical trainers ,project sponsors |
$3,360.00 |
1.3 |
Analyzing current issues of Virtucon |
6 days |
Mon 2/19/18 |
Mon 2/26/18 |
3 |
Resource manager ,application programmer |
$2,016.00 |
1.4 |
Setting project goals |
5 days |
Mon 2/19/18 |
Fri 2/23/18 |
3 |
Resource manager |
$880.00 |
1.5 |
collecting functional requirements |
9 days |
Tue 2/27/18 |
Fri 3/9/18 |
4 |
R &D team |
$2,448.00 |
1.6 |
Collecting non functional requirements |
5 days |
Mon 3/12/18 |
Fri 3/16/18 |
5,6 |
Project manager |
$2,000.00 |
1.7 |
Project feasibility study |
6 days |
Mon 3/19/18 |
Mon 3/26/18 |
7 |
Project manager , Website developer |
$4,080.00 |
1.8 |
Milestone 1: Completion of project initial documentation |
0 days |
Mon 3/26/18 |
Mon 3/26/18 |
8 |
application programmer ,Operation manager ,Project manager |
$0.00 |
2 |
Project planning phase |
44 days |
Tue 3/27/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
$13,536.00 |
||
2.1 |
Web front end design |
3 days |
Tue 3/27/18 |
Thu 3/29/18 |
9 |
application programmer ,Technical trainers ,Website developer |
$2,136.00 |
2.2 |
Website specification analysis |
6 days |
Fri 3/30/18 |
Fri 4/6/18 |
11 |
Website developer ,system designer |
$2,736.00 |
2.3 |
Developing communication planning |
9 days |
Mon 4/9/18 |
Thu 4/19/18 |
12 |
HR manager |
$1,656.00 |
2.4 |
stakeholder management plan |
8 days |
Fri 4/20/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
13 |
Operation manager |
$1,600.00 |
2.5 |
Procurement planning |
10 days |
Wed 5/2/18 |
Tue 5/15/18 |
14 |
Marketing manager |
$2,400.00 |
2.6 |
Risk management program |
8 days |
Wed 5/16/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
15 |
Operation manager ,Resource manager |
$3,008.00 |
2.7 |
Milestone 2: Completion of project planning phase |
0 days |
Fri 5/25/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
16 |
Operation manager ,Marketing manager |
$0.00 |
3 |
Project development phase |
49 days |
Mon 5/28/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
$24,144.00 |
||
3.1 |
Prototype outline design |
10 days |
Mon 5/28/18 |
Fri 6/8/18 |
17 |
system designer ,application programmer ,Website developer |
$6,160.00 |
3.2 |
Prototype specification |
12 days |
Mon 6/11/18 |
Tue 6/26/18 |
19 |
Website developer ,system designer |
$5,472.00 |
3.3 |
Determining other project ideas |
12 days |
Mon 6/11/18 |
Tue 6/26/18 |
19 |
Project manager |
$4,800.00 |
3.4 |
Web design ideation |
8 days |
Wed 6/27/18 |
Fri 7/6/18 |
20 |
application programmer |
$1,280.00 |
3.5 |
Connectivity with database |
9 days |
Mon 7/9/18 |
Thu 7/19/18 |
22,21 |
Resource manager ,Technical trainers |
$4,032.00 |
3.6 |
Details function verification |
10 days |
Fri 7/20/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
23 |
Marketing manager |
$2,400.00 |
3.7 |
Milestone 3: Successful design plan coding |
0 days |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
24 |
system tester ,application programmer ,Project manager |
$0.00 |
4 |
Project testing phase |
21 days |
Fri 8/3/18 |
Fri 8/31/18 |
$10,296.00 |
||
4.1 |
Project unit testing |
6 days |
Fri 8/3/18 |
Fri 8/10/18 |
25 |
system designer ,system tester |
$3,456.00 |
4.2 |
Integrated testing |
6 days |
Mon 8/13/18 |
Mon 8/20/18 |
27 |
system tester ,coder |
$3,600.00 |
4.3 |
Acceptance testing |
9 days |
Tue 8/21/18 |
Fri 8/31/18 |
27,28 |
application programmer ,Operation manager |
$3,240.00 |
4.4 |
Milestone 4: Approval of the prototype |
0 days |
Fri 8/31/18 |
Fri 8/31/18 |
29 |
system tester ,system designer |
$0.00 |
5 |
Closure phase |
12 days |
Mon 9/3/18 |
Tue 9/18/18 |
$12,288.00 |
||
5.1 |
stakeholders signoff |
6 days |
Mon 9/3/18 |
Mon 9/10/18 |
30 |
HR manager, Operation manager ,Project manager |
$4,704.00 |
5.2 |
Submitting final report |
6 days |
Tue 9/11/18 |
Tue 9/18/18 |
32 |
Technical trainers ,R &D team ,Marketing manager ,Operation manager ,Website developer |
$7,584.00 |
5.3 |
Milestone 5: Post maintenance program development |
0 days |
Tue 9/18/18 |
Tue 9/18/18 |
33 |
Project manager |
$0.00 |
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
Resource Names |
6 |
Milestone 1: Submission of initial document |
0 days |
Mon 3/26/18 |
Mon 3/26/18 |
8 |
Operation manager |
7 |
Milestone 2: Submission of planning details |
0 days |
Fri 5/25/18 |
Fri 5/25/18 |
16 |
Resource manager |
8 |
Milestone 3: submission of prototype or testing |
0 days |
Thu 8/2/18 |
Thu 8/2/18 |
24 |
R &D team |
9 |
Milestone 4: Approval of the prototype |
0 days |
Fri 8/31/18 |
Fri 8/31/18 |
29 |
Marketing manager |
10 |
Milestone 5: post maintenance program submission |
0 days |
Tue 9/18/18 |
Tue 9/18/18 |
33 |
Operation manager |
Assumptions
- To complete the project in 8 months
- To complete the project within the estimated budget of $80,000
Risk assessment
Risks |
Strategies |
Resource over allocation |
I-Crop should focus on developing online crop buying selling platform to the consumers. Based on the project specifications the project manager should assign the project resources at the project initiation phase. |
Distributed project team |
Due to the distributed project team internal conflict may occur and that can be resolved is the project team members follow open communication approach. |
Lack of technical experienced members |
Proper technical and development program |
Team philosophy
The aim of Globex is to deliver an affordable, user friendly as well as business effective crop selling buying online platform to the consumers of I-Crop.
Set of verification activity
Verification Activity |
When? |
Software and hardware verification |
Initiation |
Feasibility study |
Initiation |
Project management practice adoption |
Planning |
Validation Activity |
When? |
Prototype testing |
Testing |
Experimental trial |
Execution |
Review documents |
Monitoring phase |
Considering proper project practices |
Initiation phase |
This article portrays the importance of stakeholder’s involvement to a project for its successful implementation. Tough, for this project the specifications are nominated for building projects. It is determined that, with different groups of project phases different stakeholders are associated (Heravi, Coffey & Trigunarsyah, 2015). This successful incorporation can be add on to the services based on the complexity of the activities and the skills and knowledge of the project stakeholders. It s examined that the level of involvement for this project is possibly mentioned for four group of stakeholders. In each of the phase their involvement plays key role. The article also reviewed that highest involvement with the project is served by the project manager whereas contractors have a lowest rate of engagement to the panning process of the projects. It also defines that the involvement of the stakeholders can improve the business effectiveness during the project initiation up to the project planning phase. How by controlling the interaction a project can be completed with the support of the stakeholders is also elaborated in this article.
This journal reflects the details of practical application as well as empirical evaluation of the reference for project management forecasting. It is defined that with the successful implementation of practical implementation the ideas of project manager will grow at a higher rate. The difference between the traditional project managers and the current project managers are also illustrated here considering the identification of the reference classes, probability distribution and class distribution (Batselier & Vanhoucke, 2016). How an empirical database management system can restrict the data flow control in a project is also illustrated in this journal. In addition to this, for selecting the reference class how the probability distribution approach is beneficial are ate illustrated here. Not only this but also, the details application of the RFC method and their 3 steps implementation process are also illustrated in this journal. Even for multiple experimental study also this approach is very much beneficial that is also elaborated here considering Monte Carlo Simulation approach.
Project Description
According to Lappe and Spang (2014), any company will be able to obtain commercial profit from the competitive market if it invests lot in project management. Considering the relationship between the costs and project management profits are all elaborated in this report. How mostly the business organizations gain commercial profit from their application are also elaborated considering both the qualitative and quantitative profits. In addition to this, the different evolutionary stages are also illustrated in this journal. There must be an accurate balance between the investment and the profit that could have gained from the project management prcatices are also mentioned here. In order to accomplish any project how the estimated cost can be structured is calculated considering the Return in Investment (ROI) cost benefit analysis approach.
Closure checklist
The testing phase of the online platform development project of ICrop has been successfully completed
- The challenges are all resolved with the risk mitigation strategies
- Final project report is also being hand over to the sponsors
Evaluation details
The MOV for the I-Crop online website development project will be functionally evaluated by the project manager before the final launching. The project manager is responsible to control and monitor progress of I-Crop project so that it can meet the preliminary set objectives and other assumptions. It is defined that the project is approved by the project manager and the project sponsors within the estimated time frame of 8 months and within the budget of $80,000. It has also successfully avoided the issues of over time allocation and over resource allocation.
References
Bilgihan, A., & Bujisic, M. (2015). The effect of website features in online relationship marketing: A case of online hotel booking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(4), 222-232.
Bilgihan, A., Nusair, K., Okumus, F., & Cobanoglu, C. (2015). Applying flow theory to booking experiences: An integrated model in an online service context. Information & Management, 52(6), 668-678.
Binder, J. (2016). Global project management: communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Routledge.
Eskerod, P., Huemann, M., & Savage, G. (2015). Project stakeholder management—past and present. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 6-14.
Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.
Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.
Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298.
Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International journal of project management, 32(2), 202-217.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
Turner, R. (2016). Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.
Verzuh, E. (2015). The fast forward MBA in project management. John Wiley & Sons.
Walker, A. (2015). Project management in construction. John Wiley & Sons.