James Cook University: Research And Teaching University In Queensland
Academic Divisions of James Cook University
JCU stands for James Cook University which is one of the oldest university in Queensland, Australia. The university offers both research and teaching to its students. The university has 7 different academic divisions. The divisions are; Public Health, Medicine & Dentistry, Medical & Veterinary Science, Law & Governance, Business, Health Science and Technology & Engineering. The Vice Chancellor of the university is interested in developing a gender neutral workplace and lowering the carbon footprint of James Cook University, that is, having a work place that is of equal opportunity for all employees at all levels. Equality in regards to remuneration (pay) and retention (time employed with JCU) are part of the mix. Staff making transport decisions that are environmentally sound is of special interest to the Vice Chancellor. We are provided with dataset and according to the dataset, the university has 4 campuses. There are hundreds of employees working at the university. Majority of the employees have worked for between 3 to 6 years with most of them being male employees.
Table 1: Descriptive statistics
Annual salary (‘000 dollars) |
|
Mean |
107.91 |
Standard Error |
3.81 |
Median |
113.00 |
Mode |
60.00 |
Standard Deviation |
38.10 |
Sample Variance |
1451.44 |
Kurtosis |
-1.28 |
Skewness |
-0.17 |
Range |
125.00 |
Minimum |
41.00 |
Maximum |
166.00 |
Sum |
10791 |
Count |
100 |
As can be seen from table 1 above, the average annual salary of the sample to the JCU staff population is $107,910. The standard deviation of the sample is 38.10; this shows that the data is not widely distributed (Trochim, 2006). Further, looking at the kurtosis and skewness we can conclude that the data is approximately normal.
There are no outliers in the sample data for the variable “Salary”. This can be confirmed from the boxplot provided below.
The coefficient of variation (CV) was found to be 35.31%, this shows that the rate of dispersion of the annual salary for the sample JCU staff is low.
As can be seen in the table below, majority of staff (45%, n = 45) had stayed in the university for more than 3 years but less than or equal to 6 years. They were followed by those who have been at the university more than 10 years (29%, n = 29). Minority of participants (1%, n = 1) were less than or equal to 3 years old at the university
Table 2: Length of stay
Length of stay |
Frequency |
Percent |
≤ 3 years |
1 |
1% |
> 3 years and ≤ 6 years |
45 |
45% |
> 6 years and ≤ 10 years |
25 |
25% |
> 10 years |
29 |
29% |
Grand Total |
100 |
100% |
The correlation coefficient between length of stay and salary is 0.034; this shows a very weak positive relationship between length of stay and salary. The p-value is 0.737 (a value greater than 5% level of significance), we thus fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the correlation between the two variables is insignificant at 5% level of significance (Székely & Bakirov, 2007).
Gender Neutral Workplace at James Cook University
Table 3: Correlations
Annual salary |
Length of stay |
||
Annual salary |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.034 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.737 |
||
N |
100 |
100 |
|
Length of stay |
Pearson Correlation |
.034 |
1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.737 |
||
N |
100 |
100 |
This can be confirmed from the scatter plot given below. The plot does not show presence of relationship between the two variables.
The table below gives the frequency distribution of the salary for the staff at JCU. As can be seen, majority of the staff (41%, n = 41) earn between 101-150K dollars every year. They are closely followed by those who earn between 51-50K dollars every year (37%, n = 37). 7% (n = 7) of the participants take less than 50K every year as their annual pay while 15% (n = 15) of the employees take home more than 150k dollars every year.
Table 4: Frequency distribution table for the Annual salary
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
||
Valid |
Less than or equal to 50K |
7 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Between 51-100K |
37 |
37.0 |
37.0 |
44.0 |
|
Between 101-150K |
41 |
41.0 |
41.0 |
85.0 |
|
More than 150K |
15 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
100 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Contingency tables
- Gender and Campus
SG campus had the lowest number of female employees (3%, n =3) when compared with all the other campuses. Each of the other three campuses had 12% (n = 12) of female employees. In terms of male employees, TSVL had the highest (21%, n = 21) while BNE had the lowest (8%, n = 8).
Table 5: Gender * Campus Cross tabulation
% of Total |
||||||
Campus |
Total |
|||||
BNE |
CNS |
SG |
TSVL |
|||
Gender |
Female |
12.0% |
12.0% |
3.0% |
12.0% |
39.0% |
Male |
8.0% |
14.0% |
18.0% |
21.0% |
61.0% |
|
Total |
20.0% |
26.0% |
21.0% |
33.0% |
100.0% |
Figure 5: Gender versus campus
Majority of female employees (17%, n = 17) were found to earn between 51-100K dollars as annual salary. 26% of the total sample of employees were men who took between 101 and 150K as annual salary.
Table 6: Gender * Annual salary Cross tabulation
% of Total |
||||||
Annual salary |
Total |
|||||
Less than or equal to 50K |
Between 51-100K |
Between 101-150K |
More than 150K |
|||
Gender |
Female |
3.0% |
17.0% |
15.0% |
4.0% |
39.0% |
Male |
4.0% |
20.0% |
26.0% |
11.0% |
61.0% |
|
Total |
7.0% |
37.0% |
41.0% |
15.0% |
100.0% |
Figure 6: Gender versus annual salary
As can be seen from the above chart, majority of male employees took home huge amounts of annual income as compared to the female employees.
Three campuses (CNS, SG and TSVL) had the highest number of employees being males. 85.7% of the employees at SG campus were male employees. CNS and TSVL had 53.8% and 63.6% male employees respectively. BNE on the other had had the higher number of employees being female employees (60%).
Table 7: Campus * Gender Cross tabulation
% within Campus |
||||
Gender |
Total |
|||
Female |
Male |
|||
Campus |
BNE |
60.0% |
40.0% |
100.0% |
CNS |
46.2% |
53.8% |
100.0% |
|
SG |
14.3% |
85.7% |
100.0% |
|
TSVL |
36.4% |
63.6% |
100.0% |
|
Total |
39.0% |
61.0% |
100.0% |
Figure 7: Campus versus gender
Majority of employees in three campuses (BNE, CNS, and SG) earned a salary of between 101 and 150K dollars every year. For TSVL, majority of its employees (57.6%) took home between 51 and 100K dollars as salary every year.
Table 8: Campus * Annual salary Cross tabulation
% within Campus |
||||||
Annual salary |
Total |
|||||
Less than or equal to 50K |
Between 51-100K |
Between 101-150K |
More than 150K |
|||
Campus |
BNE |
5.0% |
20.0% |
45.0% |
30.0% |
100.0% |
CNS |
3.8% |
42.3% |
42.3% |
11.5% |
100.0% |
|
SG |
19.0% |
14.3% |
47.6% |
19.0% |
100.0% |
|
TSVL |
3.0% |
57.6% |
33.3% |
6.1% |
100.0% |
|
Total |
7.0% |
37.0% |
41.0% |
15.0% |
100.0% |
Figure 8: Campus versus annual salary
Considering the whole university, we found out that majority of employees (36%, n = 36) had master’s level. The least (18%, n = 18) either had post-secondary level or Bachelor’s level. Doctorate level was represented by 28% (n = 28) of all the employees interviewed.
The pie charts presented below compares the education level across the four campuses.
In BNE, employees with doctorate and master’s levels were each 35%. Only 5% had Bachelor’s level while 25% had post-secondary level. For SG, majority of employees (33.33%) had doctorate levels with 28.57% having master’s level while those with Bachelor’s and post-secondary level each had 19.05% representation.
In CNS and TSVL campuses, majority of the employees (38.46% and 45.45% respectively) had master’s level while PhD level was at 34.62% and 30.30% respectively. Post-secondary level and Bachelor’s level had 15.38% and 11.54% respectively in CNS while TSVL it was 9.09% and 15.15% respectively.
Majority of male employees (37.70%) had up to master’s level while for the female employees, majority (35.90%) had doctorate level. For the males, 22.95% had doctorate level and 33.33% of the female employees had master’s level.
References
Székely, G. J., & Bakirov, N. K. (2007). Measuring and testing independence by correlation of distances. Annals of Statistics, 35(6), 2769–2794.
Trochim, W. M. (2006). Descriptive statistics. Research Methods Knowledge Base.